PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.96%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 4.86%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.94%
D&A growth of 0.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
41.75%
Deferred tax growth of 41.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-1.97%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-62.68%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-132.26%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-19.19%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
117.70%
AP growth of 117.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
25.10%
Growth of 25.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
3.08%
Growth of 3.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-31.01%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
21.72%
CapEx growth of 21.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-262.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
46.93%
Purchases growth of 46.93% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-31.75%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
21.28%
Growth of 21.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
77.61%
Investing flow of 77.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.63%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
0.95%
Buyback growth of 0.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.