PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
87.28%
Net income growth of 87.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
10.51%
D&A growth of 10.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-2906.74%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
10.39%
SBC growth of 10.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
35687.74%
Working capital of 35687.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-1.75%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
125.39%
Inventory growth of 125.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-15.02%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
373.56%
Growth of 373.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
54.17%
A moderate rise while Technology median is negative at -3.12%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
80.72%
CFO growth of 80.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
29.75%
CapEx growth of 29.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-113.58%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-14.99%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
2.00%
Proceeds growth of 2.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
53.76%
Growth of 53.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-36.69%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-0.46%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-29.51%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.