PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 3.21%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-2.70%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
326.10%
Deferred tax growth of 326.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
0.22%
SBC growth of 0.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
10.60%
Working capital of 10.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-97.44%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
152.24%
Inventory growth of 152.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
106.48%
AP growth of 106.48% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-166.86%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-85.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-4.24%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
22.12%
CapEx growth of 22.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
4.55%
Acquisition growth of 4.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-29.31%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-56.50%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-385.33%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-86.25%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.67%
Buyback growth of 8.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.