PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Net income growth of 22.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
3.34%
D&A growth of 3.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-53.91%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-0.44%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
142.53%
Working capital of 142.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-3996.14%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
14.71%
Inventory growth of 14.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
1174.40%
AP growth of 1174.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
112.63%
Growth of 112.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
86.87%
Growth of 86.87% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
34.75%
CFO growth of 34.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
6.92%
CapEx growth of 6.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-130.16%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-64.42%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-8.80%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
69.96%
Growth of 69.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-176.03%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34000.00%
Issuance growth of 34000.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
8.08%
Buyback growth of 8.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.