PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.35%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -10.58%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
23.28%
D&A growth of 23.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-89.79%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
15.91%
SBC growth of 15.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
117.69%
Working capital of 117.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
156.51%
AR growth of 156.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-155.41%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-141.85%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-727.12%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-58.82%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -11.25%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
36.71%
CFO growth of 36.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-10.33%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
42.41%
Acquisition growth of 42.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
50.97%
Purchases growth of 50.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
6.73%
Proceeds growth of 6.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
74.77%
Growth of 74.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
294.74%
Investing flow of 294.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
53.96%
Buyback growth of 53.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.