PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.26%
Net income growth of 36.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
8.39%
D&A growth of 8.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-451.16%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
0.20%
SBC growth of 0.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
177.20%
Working capital of 177.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-1054.08%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-152.26%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
8027.73%
AP growth of 8027.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
163.98%
Growth of 163.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-149.60%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
71.11%
CFO growth of 71.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-38.85%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
95.94%
Acquisition growth of 95.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-120.96%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-45.45%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-171.81%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-102.90%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-10.17%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
38900.00%
Issuance growth of 38900.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-2.88%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.