PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.47%
Net income growth of 62.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-11.42%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-15.56%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
14.08%
SBC growth of 14.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
96.53%
Working capital of 96.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
122.98%
AR growth of 122.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
96.43%
Inventory growth of 96.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-106.09%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
552.32%
Growth of 552.32% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
54.49%
Growth of 54.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
53.27%
CFO growth of 53.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
24.13%
CapEx growth of 24.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-7269.23%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-106.75%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
29.29%
Proceeds growth of 29.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
74.44%
Growth of 74.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-1612.78%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
63.39%
Debt repayment growth of 63.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-99.49%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-18.70%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.