PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
126.90%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -1.06%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-1.33%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
85.39%
Deferred tax growth of 85.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
17.17%
SBC growth of 17.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
38.12%
Working capital of 38.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-719.06%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-593.43%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
222.23%
AP growth of 222.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
210.42%
Growth of 210.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
933.33%
A moderate rise while Technology median is negative at -1.72%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
88.39%
CFO growth of 88.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-96.19%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
82.35%
Acquisition growth of 82.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-117.11%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
33.80%
Proceeds growth of 33.80% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
291.18%
Growth of 291.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-255.20%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
81.67%
Debt repayment growth of 81.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-44.15%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.