PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.98%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.20%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
1.25%
D&A growth of 1.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-255.70%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.06%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-24.29%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-88.01%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
104.71%
Inventory growth of 104.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
100.89%
AP growth of 100.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-68.11%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
56.91%
Growth of 56.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-12.04%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
7.76%
CapEx growth of 7.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-5.07%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.45%
Investing flow of 134.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
14.29%
Debt repayment growth of 14.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-21.50%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.