PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.49%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
5.54%
D&A growth of 5.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-661.70%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-0.77%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
61.89%
Working capital of 61.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-954.41%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-11092.31%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
6588.15%
AP growth of 6588.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-164.58%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
352.09%
Growth of 352.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-4.24%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-53.99%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-400.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
20.33%
Purchases growth of 20.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-20.22%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.62%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-74.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.76%
Buyback growth of 13.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.