PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.26%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.77%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
2.48%
D&A growth of 2.48% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
310.84%
Deferred tax growth of 310.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.40%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-57.16%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-110.35%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-104.17%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
79.79%
AP growth of 79.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-322.42%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
78.07%
Growth of 78.07% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-18.72%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
16.39%
CapEx growth of 16.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.75%
Purchases growth of 69.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-26.78%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-70.91%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
145.70%
Investing flow of 145.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-71.33%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
Buyback growth of 3.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.