PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.58%
Net income growth of 6.58% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
2.14%
D&A growth of 2.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-211.57%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
1.56%
SBC growth of 1.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
98.51%
Working capital of 98.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-550.76%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
2818.75%
Inventory growth of 2818.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
456.95%
AP growth of 456.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
159.40%
Growth of 159.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
519.51%
Growth of 519.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
5.39%
CFO growth of 5.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-56.47%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-6750.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
17.65%
Purchases growth of 17.65% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-36.93%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
3.24%
Growth of 3.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-128.74%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
6.90%
Debt repayment growth of 6.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.72%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.