229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.77%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -0.27%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
1.78%
D&A expands slightly while Technology is negative at -0.00%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
27.52%
SBC growth of 27.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-3018.75%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
166.96%
AR growth of 166.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-515.40%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-139.05%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-39.91%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-284.30%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -11.25%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
40.94%
Positive CFO growth while Technology median is negative at -6.73%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-15.14%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
23.60%
Purchases growth of 23.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-20.05%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
76.38%
Growth of 76.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-18.73%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
49.84%
Debt repayment growth of 49.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.28%
Buyback growth of 20.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.