PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.51%
Net income growth 10-15% – Solid. Seth Klarman would see it as healthy if margins also remain stable.
14.81%
D&A 10-15% yoy – Potential drag on reported income. Howard Marks would question if ROI on assets justifies it.
-252.38%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
4.62%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
323.60%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
52.90%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-120.93%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
-2.63%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
-161.57%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
400.00%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would investigate whether this is a recurring or truly one-time distortion.
38.22%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
19.03%
CapEx above 15% yoy – Significant. Philip Fisher would demand strong evidence of high-ROI projects to offset the spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.32%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
25.36%
Proceeds growth 20-30% yoy – Very strong. Benjamin Graham would ensure no forced liquidations at a suboptimal time.
-28.57%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
127.63%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.83%
A negative yoy figure could mean fewer or no new shares or even net buybacks. Benjamin Graham would see it as positive unless expansions need capital that internal cash cannot provide.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.