253.78 - 257.33
169.21 - 260.10
43.87M / 67.97M (Avg.)
35.19 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.73% VS 8.89%
Revenue growth similar to SONY's 8.89%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-3.08% VS 1.13%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.75% VS -214.94%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.75% VS -214.94%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
5.26% VS 63.46%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 63.46%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.26% VS 63.46%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 63.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26% VS 63.46%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 63.46%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.61% VS 0.01%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.37% VS 0.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.24% VS 136.73%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 136.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-783.33% VS 74.08%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 74.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-39.46% VS 63.69%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 63.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-33.64% VS 7.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 7.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.61% VS -9.77%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-99.57% VS 0.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-98.70% VS 0.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-99.43% VS 0.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-79.43% VS -154.38%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
102.81% VS -131.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-77.14% VS -125.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
33.65% VS 34.13%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SONY's 34.13%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
129.69% VS 43.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 43.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
42.40% VS -0.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00% VS 0.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.32% VS 1.58%
AR growth well above SONY's 1.58%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04% VS -9.84%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.32% VS 1.96%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 1.96%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
0.59% VS -3.51%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.27% VS 8.24%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 8.24%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-1.77% VS 0.00%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.57% VS 2.67%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
