253.78 - 257.33
169.21 - 260.10
43.87M / 67.97M (Avg.)
35.19 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.68% VS -23.65%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.42% VS -30.76%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
77.78% VS -166.67%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
77.78% VS -166.67%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
73.77% VS -146.47%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
68.97% VS -146.54%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
67.86% VS -150.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.27% VS -0.56%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.35% VS -7.57%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.95% VS 0.44%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.44%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
121.97% VS -9.93%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-40.93% VS 57.77%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 57.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
43.93% VS 0.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
48.24% VS -12.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
14.70% VS 0.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 14.70% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
66.28% VS 0.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 66.28% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
47.35% VS -42.27%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-42.06% VS -222.40%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-21.86% VS -146.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
46.90% VS -427.26%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.49% VS 54.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 54.98%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
33.81% VS 16.32%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.44% VS 1.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.49%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00% VS 0.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.05% VS -24.90%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
40.28% VS -6.46%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.45% VS -3.19%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.14% VS 2.31%
1.25-1.5x SONY's 2.31%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.40% VS 0.00%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.06% VS 3.24%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 3.24%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
