253.78 - 257.33
169.21 - 260.10
43.87M / 67.97M (Avg.)
35.19 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.77% VS 40.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 40.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.90% VS 83.09%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 83.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-19.43% VS 1284.27%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 1284.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.43% VS 1284.27%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 1284.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
6.23% VS 738.54%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 738.54%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.64% VS 738.41%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 738.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.81% VS 738.90%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 738.90%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.44% VS 0.00%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.45% VS -0.08%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.17% VS 828.26%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 828.26%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
77.65% VS 176.15%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 176.15%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
81.81% VS 16.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
211.30% VS 4.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
132.44% VS 3.49%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
447.70% VS 0.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 447.70% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
2826.79% VS -53.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
403.19% VS -13.67%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1018.29% VS 17.24%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.24% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2001.90% VS 69.99%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 69.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1060.35% VS 17.71%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.71%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
554.23% VS 92.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 92.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
171.07% VS 33.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 33.23%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
141.03% VS 36.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 36.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.03% VS 47.60%
AR growth well above SONY's 47.60%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
20.67% VS -16.17%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
15.69% VS 7.16%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 7.16%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.84% VS 6.87%
1.25-1.5x SONY's 6.87%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66% VS 0.00%
R&D growth of 13.66% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.71% VS 36.22%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 36.22%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
