253.78 - 257.33
169.21 - 260.10
43.87M / 67.97M (Avg.)
35.19 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.57% VS -5.33%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
46.24% VS 308.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 308.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
57.26% VS 11959.14%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 11959.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
57.26% VS 11959.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 11959.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
59.04% VS 95.60%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 95.60%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
61.29% VS 95.61%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SONY's 95.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
58.06% VS 95.61%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SONY's 95.61%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.06% VS -0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.10% VS -0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41% VS -110.84%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
272.16% VS -181.77%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2732.38% VS -19.81%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
429.26% VS -23.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
234.49% VS -5.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
16188.16% VS -205.24%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
684.10% VS 72.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 72.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
289.96% VS -144.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
166808.11% VS -116.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
671.64% VS -123.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
272.57% VS 48.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 48.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2266.34% VS -24.04%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
606.94% VS -45.76%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
242.62% VS -35.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.11% VS -7.54%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
83.94% VS 12.09%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 12.09%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.37% VS -1.24%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.66% VS -3.69%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48% VS 0.00%
R&D growth of 11.48% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
11.33% VS -2.23%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
