229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
1.40
D/E of 1.40 while WLDS has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
4.43
Net debt of 4.43 while WLDS shows zero net debt. Bruce Berkowitz would look for higher returns justifying the leverage.
16.98
Positive coverage while WLDS shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our competitive advantages in a challenging market.
1.50
Current ratio of 1.50 while WLDS has zero ratio. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our working capital management provides advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
