PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.08%
Negative ROE while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.02%
Negative ROA while JD stands at 0.00%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.53%
ROCE of 0.53% while JD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
28.62%
Gross margin above 1.5x JD's 8.90%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
0.50%
Positive operating margin while JD is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
-0.04%
Both companies run at a net loss. Martin Whitman would see if broader market headwinds persist.