PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-121.38%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-13.11%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 2.02%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-13.67%
Negative ROCE while VIPS is at 3.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
-10.63%
Negative margin while VIPS has 23.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent cost or pricing measures.
-35.04%
Negative operating margin while VIPS has 6.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-47.81%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 5.77%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.