PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
3.47%
Similar ROE to VIPS's 3.77%. Walter Schloss would examine if both firms share comparable business models.
-2.71%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 2.02%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
5.05%
ROCE 1.25-1.5x VIPS's 3.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm’s capital structure drives superior returns.
10.40%
Gross margin below 50% of VIPS's 23.46%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
3.80%
Operating margin 50-75% of VIPS's 6.58%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.
-3.94%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 5.77%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.