PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-7.06%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
3.38%
ROA above 1.5x VIPS's 2.02%. David Dodd would verify if the company’s niche or scale drives superior asset efficiency.
15.13%
ROCE above 1.5x VIPS's 3.81%. David Dodd would check if sustainable process or technology advantages are in play.
11.11%
Gross margin below 50% of VIPS's 23.46%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
7.07%
Similar margin to VIPS's 6.58%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies share cost structures or economies of scale.
3.76%
Net margin 50-75% of VIPS's 5.77%. Martin Whitman would question if fundamental disadvantages limit net earnings.