PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-9.61%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
4.03%
ROA above 1.5x VIPS's 2.02%. David Dodd would verify if the company’s niche or scale drives superior asset efficiency.
8.85%
ROCE above 1.5x VIPS's 3.81%. David Dodd would check if sustainable process or technology advantages are in play.
10.38%
Gross margin below 50% of VIPS's 23.46%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
6.20%
Similar margin to VIPS's 6.58%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies share cost structures or economies of scale.
5.48%
Similar net margin to VIPS's 5.77%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.