PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-81.25%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
2.00%
Similar ROA to VIPS's 2.02%. Peter Lynch might expect similar cost structures or operational dynamics.
7.14%
ROCE above 1.5x VIPS's 3.81%. David Dodd would check if sustainable process or technology advantages are in play.
10.61%
Gross margin below 50% of VIPS's 23.46%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
5.93%
Similar margin to VIPS's 6.58%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies share cost structures or economies of scale.
2.97%
Net margin 50-75% of VIPS's 5.77%. Martin Whitman would question if fundamental disadvantages limit net earnings.