PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
2.46%
ROE of 2.46% while VIPS has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
1.06%
ROA of 1.06% while VIPS has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
2.03%
ROCE of 2.03% while VIPS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
7.56%
Gross margin below 50% of VIPS's 18.32%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
2.03%
Positive operating margin while VIPS is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
1.93%
Positive net margin while VIPS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.