PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.08%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 4.61%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.02%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 1.64%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.53%
ROCE below 50% of VIPS's 3.44%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
28.62%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x VIPS's 23.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
0.50%
Operating margin below 50% of VIPS's 1.92%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
-0.04%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.