PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.45%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.13%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 1.56%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.16%
Negative ROCE while VIPS is at 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
27.65%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x VIPS's 24.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-0.15%
Negative operating margin while VIPS has 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-0.24%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.