PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.52%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 12.22%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.11%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 2.15%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.95%
ROCE below 50% of VIPS's 5.48%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
32.23%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x VIPS's 24.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
1.12%
Operating margin below 50% of VIPS's 4.59%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
-0.25%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.