PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.87%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.94%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 1.92%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
1.35%
ROCE below 50% of VIPS's 3.56%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
42.89%
Gross margin above 1.5x VIPS's 19.84%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
3.15%
Operating margin 50-75% of VIPS's 5.08%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.
-3.30%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.