PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.54%
Negative ROE while VIPS stands at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.48%
Negative ROA while VIPS stands at 2.14%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
1.19%
ROCE below 50% of VIPS's 3.46%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
45.21%
Gross margin above 1.5x VIPS's 20.48%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
2.74%
Operating margin 50-75% of VIPS's 5.17%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.
-1.67%
Negative net margin while VIPS has 5.23%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.