1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-4.59%
Cash & equivalents declining -4.59% while RVPH's grows 95.93%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-40.54%
Both RVPH and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-4.61%
Below half of RVPH's 95.93%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.92%
Below half of RVPH's 72.84%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
10.64%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.58%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.86%
Below half of RVPH's 64.40%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-12.14%
Less than half of RVPH's 5.25%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Above 1.5x RVPH's -49.51%. Michael Burry sees a major discrepancy in short-term leverage. Check coverage and liquidity carefully.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both RVPH and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-34.95%
Less than half of RVPH's 8.21%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-29.36%
Less than half of RVPH's 4.94%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.36%
Less than half of RVPH's 4.83%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
3.53%
Less than half of RVPH's 45.49%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-3.88%
Similar yoy to RVPH's -3.55%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-25.46%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.65%
Below half RVPH's 89.71%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.86%
Below half RVPH's 64.40%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-40.54%
Both RVPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-100.00%
Above 1.5x RVPH's -49.51%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
4.24%
Less than half of RVPH's -102.37%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.