1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
0.15%
Cash & equivalents growing 0.15% while RVPH's declined -6.45%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.15%
Below half of RVPH's -6.45%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.11%
Below half of RVPH's -7.23%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-7.73%
Both RVPH and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.07%
Both RVPH and the company show zero Total Non-Current Assets Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Below half of RVPH's -7.23%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
10.13%
50-75% of RVPH's 17.45%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
-6.71%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.13%
Both RVPH and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
6.71%
Less than half of RVPH's -31.27%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
8.18%
Less than half of RVPH's -16.26%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.12%
Above 1.5x RVPH's -23.53%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.04%
Less than half of RVPH's -19.33%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
4.76%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.66%
0.5-0.75x RVPH's -3.74%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
100.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
Below half RVPH's -6.52%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.03%
Below half RVPH's -7.23%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.42%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.28%
Less than half of RVPH's 6.45%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
