1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-304.05%
Negative net income growth while AVXL stands at 76.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.69%
Slight usage while AVXL is negative at -106.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
176.34%
A yoy AP increase while AVXL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-34.25%
Negative yoy usage while AVXL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
198.30%
Some yoy increase while AVXL is negative at -395.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
56.08%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVXL's 1.73%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
100.00%
CapEx growth of 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
100.00%
We expand invests by 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
42.27%
Debt repayment growth of 42.27% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.