1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.30%
Negative net income growth while AVXL stands at 21.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
24.17%
D&A growth of 24.17% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-9.33%
Negative yoy SBC while AVXL is 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-80.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVXL at -137.02%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.04%
Negative yoy AP while AVXL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-249.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVXL at -137.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-101.42%
Both negative yoy, with AVXL at -136.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-72.30%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AVXL at -65.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-455.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while AVXL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-427.62%
We reduce yoy invests while AVXL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53916.27%
We slightly raise equity while AVXL is negative at -12.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.