1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.28%
Negative net income growth while AVXL stands at 11.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.30%
D&A growth of 1.30% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.15%
SBC growth while AVXL is negative at -34.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
170.16%
Slight usage while AVXL is negative at -193.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.16%
Some yoy usage while AVXL is negative at -193.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
169.42%
Some yoy increase while AVXL is negative at -260.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-4.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AVXL at -73.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
94.15%
CapEx growth of 94.15% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand invests by 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.06%
Negative yoy issuance while AVXL is 202.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.