PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM)
1.780.01 (-0.56%)
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.66%
Negative net income growth while AVXL stands at 9.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.04%
D&A growth of 13.04% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while AVXL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
1.43%
SBC growth while AVXL is negative at -11.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-401.62%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVXL at -56.45%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while AVXL is 109.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-97.99%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVXL at -89.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while AVXL is 141.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-93.84%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AVXL at -43.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-375.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while AVXL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-375.00%
We reduce yoy invests while AVXL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.27%
Negative yoy issuance while AVXL is 10151.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.