PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.38%
Some net income increase while AXSM is negative at -5.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.11%
Less D&A growth vs. AXSM's 87.08%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-10.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AXSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-5.75%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AXSM at -4.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
224.19%
Well above AXSM's 90.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
351.62%
A yoy AP increase while AXSM is negative at -30.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-1034.42%
Negative yoy usage while AXSM is 670.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-5.75%
Both negative yoy, with AXSM at -30.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.47%
Operating cash flow growth similar to AXSM's 9.64%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
90.96%
Some CapEx rise while AXSM is negative at -557.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.96%
We have mild expansions while AXSM is negative at -557.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.15%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AXSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-84.36%
Negative yoy issuance while AXSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.