PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AXSM at -1.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.12%
Negative yoy D&A while AXSM is 73.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
11.01%
Deferred tax of 11.01% while AXSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
20.13%
SBC growth while AXSM is negative at -5.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
171.56%
Slight usage while AXSM is negative at -120.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.25%
A yoy AP increase while AXSM is negative at -74.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
60.10%
Some yoy usage while AXSM is negative at -156.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
20.13%
Some yoy increase while AXSM is negative at -91.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
23.86%
Some CFO growth while AXSM is negative at -50.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1272.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while AXSM is 92.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1272.99%
We reduce yoy invests while AXSM stands at 92.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-196.64%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AXSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
1193.74%
Issuance growth of 1193.74% while AXSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.