1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.72%
Positive EBIT growth while AGEN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.72%
Positive operating income growth while AGEN is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
12.50%
Positive net income growth while AGEN is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.94%
Positive EPS growth while AGEN is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.94%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AGEN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.10%
Share count expansion well above AGEN's 6.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.10%
Diluted share count expanding well above AGEN's 6.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.84%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.79%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48098.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-29341.33%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-23.11%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-39968.68%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-32.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-188.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
7755.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AGEN's 21.73%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
2687.68%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AGEN is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-9.18%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.88%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-33.82%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.78%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-14.34%
We cut SG&A while AGEN invests at 4.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.