1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2634.20%
Negative EBIT growth while AXSM is at 23.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-468.26%
Negative operating income growth while AXSM is at 35.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-263.73%
Negative net income growth while AXSM stands at 19.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-197.18%
Negative EPS growth while AXSM is at 20.49%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-197.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AXSM is at 20.49%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
22.83%
Share count expansion well above AXSM's 1.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
22.83%
Diluted share count expanding well above AXSM's 1.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.01%
Negative OCF growth while AXSM is at 25.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.21%
Negative FCF growth while AXSM is at 25.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-319.11%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-319.11%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
52.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AXSM's 23.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-5305.80%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-5305.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-47.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AXSM is 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-1146.88%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AXSM stands at 360.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-1146.88%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
3.51%
Below 50% of AXSM's 280.02%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while AXSM shows 23.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.29%
Under 50% of AXSM's 35.76%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
10.32%
Debt growth far above AXSM's 2.81%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
402.37%
SG&A growth well above AXSM's 7.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.