1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of TRAW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
27.70%
Positive operating income growth while TRAW is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-117.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-117.27%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-117.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-138.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-138.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of TRAW's 77.68%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
64.97%
Positive OCF/share growth while TRAW is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
27.61%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while TRAW is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
64.19%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of TRAW's 98.31%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
64.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while TRAW is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-5.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while TRAW is at 7609.85%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.50%
We have a declining book value while TRAW shows 59775.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.88%
We cut SG&A while TRAW invests at 61301.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.