PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM)
1.780.01 (-0.56%)
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 297.6K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-314.19%
Negative EBIT growth while TRAW is at 27.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
7.75%
Operating income growth under 50% of TRAW's 27.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-313.81%
Negative net income growth while TRAW stands at 28.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-286.19%
Negative EPS growth while TRAW is at 48.52%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-286.19%
Negative diluted EPS growth while TRAW is at 48.52%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
6.89%
Share reduction more than 1.5x TRAW's 38.36%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
6.89%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x TRAW's 38.36%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.02%
Positive OCF growth while TRAW is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.84%
Positive FCF growth while TRAW is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14746.74%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while TRAW stands at 55.44%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-19558.18%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while TRAW is at 55.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-11613.56%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while TRAW stands at 55.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-30946.59%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-34054.52%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-30407.41%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-3646.86%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while TRAW stands at 136.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-832.34%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while TRAW is at 136.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-628.80%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while TRAW is at 136.63%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.36%
Positive asset growth while TRAW is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-341.43%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.27%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
43.14%
We expand SG&A while TRAW cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.