1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3986.96%
Growth of 3986.96% while RVPH shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
804.39%
Growth of 804.39% while RVPH shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
117.23%
Margin change of 117.23% while RVPH shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-19.33%
R&D reduction while RVPH shows 118.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-34.65%
G&A reduction while RVPH shows 24.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.37%
Operating expenses reduction while RVPH shows 87.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.37%
Total costs reduction while RVPH shows 87.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.46%
EBITDA growth while RVPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
98.45%
Margin change of 98.45% while RVPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
35.83%
Operating income growth while RVPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
98.43%
Margin change of 98.43% while RVPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-7.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.97%
Pre-tax income growth while RVPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
98.43%
Margin change of 98.43% while RVPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.40%
Net income growth while RVPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
98.44%
Margin change of 98.44% while RVPH is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
37.84%
EPS growth while RVPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.84%
Diluted EPS growth while RVPH declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.81%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RVPH's 43.43%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
2.81%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RVPH's 43.43%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.