PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.31%
Net income growth at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 59.23%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
4.17%
Some D&A expansion while E4C.DE is negative at -0.24%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while E4C.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while E4C.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-104.20%
Both negative yoy, with E4C.DE at -145.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-24.06%
Negative yoy CFO while E4C.DE is 17.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
48.19%
CapEx growth of 48.19% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-106.13%
Negative yoy acquisition while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.01%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. E4C.DE's 200.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
55.92%
Investing outflow well above E4C.DE's 39.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
81.59%
Debt repayment growth of 81.59% while E4C.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.