PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.53%
Some net income increase while LSX.DE is negative at -192.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.85%
D&A growth well above LSX.DE's 10.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSX.DE at -6.87%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above LSX.DE's 6.26%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while LSX.DE is 463.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-24.50%
Negative yoy while LSX.DE is 151.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-23.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSX.DE at -32.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
27.37%
Some CapEx rise while LSX.DE is negative at -76.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. LSX.DE's 674.32%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.20%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSX.DE's 321.32%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
75.87%
We have mild expansions while LSX.DE is negative at -49.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
35.91%
Debt repayment well below LSX.DE's 79.69%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.