PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.31%
Some net income increase while MZX.DE is negative at -52.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.17%
D&A growth well above MZX.DE's 0.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while MZX.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MZX.DE is 63.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MZX.DE at -748.48%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above MZX.DE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-104.20%
Negative yoy while MZX.DE is 7085.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-24.06%
Negative yoy CFO while MZX.DE is 1350.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
48.19%
Some CapEx rise while MZX.DE is negative at -70.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-106.13%
Negative yoy acquisition while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.01%
Growth well above MZX.DE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
55.92%
We have mild expansions while MZX.DE is negative at -70.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
81.59%
We repay more while MZX.DE is negative at -564.57%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.