3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.01%
Positive revenue growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.02%
Positive gross profit growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
569.92%
EBIT growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 8.56%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
569.92%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
166.51%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while E4C.DE is at 3790.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while E4C.DE is 3790.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-100.00%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while E4C.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-100.00%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.19%
AR growth of 26.19% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
3.17%
We show growth while E4C.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.20%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.24%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.76%
SG&A growth of 18.76% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.