PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.43%
Positive revenue growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.32%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 0.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
229.06%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
229.06%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
133.80%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 8.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
26.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
26.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 5.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.31%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 4585.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
63.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 55.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
63.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
18.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 18.10% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
18.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 8.00%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.59%
AR growth of 21.59% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
3.91%
We show growth while E4C.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.82%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.86%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.97%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.