PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.86%
Negative revenue growth while E4C.DE stands at 32.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.84%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-114.18%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-114.18%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-253.35%
Negative net income growth while E4C.DE stands at 83.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-227.81%
Negative EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-227.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
20.00%
Share count expansion well above E4C.DE's 7.91%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above E4C.DE's 8.44%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.90%
AR growth of 21.90% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
36.00%
We show growth while E4C.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
42.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 21.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-16.04%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
119.20%
We have some new debt while E4C.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.25%
SG&A growth of 3.25% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.